|
|
|
2020 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
202-546-0054
One Penn Plaza, Suite 6202
212-290-1585
One Penn Plaza, Suite 6202
212-290-1585
Religion Newswire 202-546-0054
2020 Pennsylvania Ave., NW |
Northland Family Planning Centers Forced to
Disclose Shocking Email Messages
Contact: Gregg Cunningham,
The Center For Bio-Ethical Reform (CBR), 714-240-6976, 714-240-6976
cell,
cbr@cbrinfo.org
LOS ANGELES, Jan. 23, 2012 /Christian
Newswire/ -- CBR recently edited abortion video footage into an
abortion industry infomercial and titled the resulting production
Angel of Light, which can be
viewed online. As a consequence, we were sued by the late-term (24
week) abortion business which owns the copyright to that infomercial in
a case titled Northland Family Planning Clinic, Inc. v. The Center For
Bio-Ethical Reform, 2011, U.S. District Court, Central District of
California, Southern Division. The Plaintiff, a chain of Michigan
abortion clinics, claim that CBR has actionably damaged their businesses
and injured their reputations by exposing the fraud through which they
deceive and exploit vulnerable young mothers and poorly informed voters.
As a result of Northland's ill-advised lawsuit, CBR has
forced the Plaintiff's abortion clinics to release email messages which
shed light on their outrage at having their false advertising exposed
and reveal their belief that their predatory practices should be immune
from public criticism. Northland's owner, Renee Chelian, received an
email message from another "Abortion Care Network" abortionist who told
her our Angel of Light video "... holds you up to public scorn
and ridicule and demeans your reputation ...."
Ms. Chelian's reputation has indeed been "ridiculed and
demeaned," but it is abortion video, and not CBR, which damages her
reputation. She replies that after seeing our Angel of Light
video, "I am sick to my stomach ...." If she really believes that
abortion is, as her narrator says, "the best you can do," why would she
be "sick" that we let her potential clients see what it looks like? Ms.
Chelian then added that "I am done crying now and just need to move
forward but these people are so hateful and disrespectful I can't stand
it." But how is it hateful for CBR to show abortions when Northland's
infomercial says abortions are a "courageous" decision?
In another email message Renee Chelian tells this same
abortionist that "I know that they [CBR] preach to their own choir but I
am worried about this." She then admits that the source of her worry is
the possibility that CBR will use our Angel of Light video for
"... anti-D&E legislation." The term "D&E" refers to dilatation and
extraction (or evacuation) abortions in which the arms and legs of
babies are torn off and removed one appendage at a time. The baby sinks
into shock and bleeds to death. She explains that "They [anti-abortion
activists] are looking for new ammunition since PBA [partial-birth
abortion] is pretty much done." Precisely. And Northland's lawsuit is
giving CBR the perfect forum in which to use that "ammunition."
Renee Chelian ends by conceding that "... this just makes
me sick. But by now I have spent several hours crying and being
miserable so I am putting on my big girl underpants and getting over
it." Ms. Chelian's "underpants" are not the sort of word picture over
which we are inclined to linger, but she is right to fear a political
backlash as more and more voters see our Angel of Light video.
D&E is a viciously savage procedure and most voters who see it aren't
likely to think it should be lawful.
At another point, the narrator of the Northland
infomercial we mocked forwarded a message to Ms. Chelian which said:
"... it's despicable what Gregg Cunningham, CBR did ...." How can it be
"despicable" to show the public something which Northland's infomercial
says it is an "honor" to do? Another abortionist sent Ms. Chelian a
similar message (with copies to the Abortion Care Network) saying: "I
also watched [the Angel of Light video] and it was so painful
to see such a sincere and good piece of work treated so shabbily. It's
really hard to have to confront these things, emotionally big downers."
It apparently isn't an "emotional downer" to kill these babies -- just
to be caught lying about killing them.
Renee Chelian then repeats that "I am sick to my stomach
as are my entire staff." Why would showing abortion sicken her if
abortion is, as her infomercial claims, a "thoughtful" decision? She
also says: "This is just wrong and hard at so many levels" and that
"This is the second time we have been attacked by an anti-abortion group
for this video." Ms. demands the right to mislead and prey upon and
victimize vulnerable young women -- and do so with impunity. She won't
get impunity from CBR. She may have a legal right to live in a twisted
fantasy world which transforms the horror of abortion into an act of
virtue, but she has no moral right to fraudulently lure others in behind
her. Her infomercial says abortion is a "normal experience" and
"sacred," and uses some variant of the word "good" eighteen times to
describe it. No wonder Renee Chelian was furious that we showed abortion
every time she lied about it.
Ms. Chelian then reveals that "There is a team of four
attorneys working on this [CBR lawsuit]" for Northland and that these
lawyers will immediately "ask for an injunction" to force CBR to take
down our Angel of Light video. Her lawyers apparently told her
that her case was too weak to warrant an injunction because they never
petitioned for one. A filing of that sort would risk the embarrassment
of the court's virtually certain rejection of Ms. Chelian's request.
That is apparently why Northland has still filed no petition for
injunctive relief, despite CBR's repeated refusal to stop posting our
Angel of Light mock-u-mentary video.
Ms. Chelian concludes one email message with a
description of "... the horrible anxiety about what to do and worrying
that it would be bigger and more scary than what we face every day." She
has every reason to be "horribly anxious" that she can no longer use the
"aroma therapy" and "soft lighting" and "relaxing music" to make her
slaughterhouse sound like a day spa. She also expresses the hope that
she can "... just end this easily and quickly." CBR Director Gregg
Cunningham announced today that "It's too late for 'easily and quickly'
now."
In paragraph 37 of their Complaint, Northland speculates
that "tens of thousands" of viewers have now seen our exposé video, on
our site and many others. By now the number is far higher. In paragraph
25 the Plaintiff says YouTube.com removed the initial concept version of
our Angel of Light parody with the explanation that "This video
... [is] a violation of YouTube's policy on shocking and disgusting
content." Our video is "shocking and disgusting" because abortion is
shocking and disgusting.
In paragraph 48 of their Complaint, the Plaintiff alleges
that as a consequence of our parody video, "... Northland has been
injured ...." In paragraph 49 they complain that "The value of the Good
Woman video as an educational and counseling tool has been diminished
..." by our parody video. In paragraph 50 they whine that as a result of
our video, "Northland's reputation has been harmed ...." Of course it
has. The truth always inhibits consumer fraud and voter deception, and
thank Heaven for that.
CBR's use of Northland's infomercial is permitted under
the Fair Use section of the U.S. Code and we are planning the production
of many additional exposé videos as we find more abortion industry
advertising, at home and abroad, which makes false and misleading
marketing claims. The more we are sued, the more numerous become the
forums in which to expose abortion clinic fraud.
|
|
Copyright © 2012 Earned Media™. All Rights Reserved. |