2020 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20006
202-546-0054
ChristianNewswire.com
209 W. 29th Street, Suite 6202
New York, NY 10001, USA.
212-290-1585
StandardNewswire.com
209 W. 29th Street, Suite 6202
New York, NY 10001
212-290-1585
CatholicWireService.com
Religion Newswire
2020 Penn. Ave., NW, Suite CCN
Washington, DC 20006
202-546-0054
ReligionNewswire.com
2020 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20006 U.S.A.
| |
Favorable Ruling from California in Abortion
Discrimination Case
NEWS PROVIDED BY
Life Legal Defense Foundation
May 19, 2023
NAPA, Calif., May 19, 2023 /Christian
Newswire/ -- A California judge ruled last week in favor of Life Legal in a
case involving our challenge to a law that prohibits all out-of-pocket expenses
for medical services related to abortion. Our challenge is based on two claims:
- Equal Protection: The law (SB 245) is unconstitutional
because it does not treat people in similar circumstances (i.e., pregnant
women) equally. The law clearly discriminates against women who choose
childbirth, and in favor of those who choose to abort.
- Right to Privacy: The law intrudes on the state
constitutional right to make certain choices free from government intrusion.
It does so by providing financial incentives to women to abort their
children.
California's Attorney General claims that the government has a
legitimate interest in making sure women "are able to exercise their
constitutional right to abortion" and argues that costs like insurance
co-payments "interfere with access to the right."
The judge agreed with us that the law is likely discriminatory. He took the
state to task for its one-sided view, noting that the Attorney General has not
provided "a rational explanation as to why the State would not also have a
legitimate interest in ensuring that those who want to are able to continue
their pregnancies" without financial barriers such as cost-sharing.
In addition, the State is asking the court to review the law under the least
robust judicial standard – the rational basis test. Under rational basis, a law
is upheld if it has some kind of rational relationship to a government interest.
Nearly every law can pass this low standard.
Life Legal argued that because the law infringes on the fundamental right to
choose to continue a pregnancy, the highest standard of judicial review should
apply – namely, strict scrutiny. This means the State must show that the law
uses the least restrictive means to further a compelling government interest.
Again, the judge agreed with us that the higher standard applied, and also
added, "The court is not satisfied that the Act passes even rational basis
review." In other words, the judge does not believe the State has adequately
shown that SB 245 is constitutional and is allowing our challenge to the law to
proceed!
This is a significant victory in California, which has the most extreme abortion
laws in the country, if not the world.
"Life Legal continues to fight the onslaught of abortion fanaticism in
California, Minnesota, and other states that have doubled down on their
baby-killing schemes," said Life Legal CEO Alexandra Snyder. "We will not sit by
as pro-aborts lure women from states with robust pro-life laws to murderous
abortion free-for-alls that are deadly for children and dangerous for women."
About Life Legal Defense Foundation
Life Legal Defense Foundation was established in 1989, and is a nonprofit
organization composed of attorneys and other concerned citizens committed to
giving helpless and innocent human beings of any age, and their advocates, a
trained and committed voice in the courtrooms of our nation. For more
information about the Life Legal Defense Foundation, visit
www.lldf.org.
SOURCE Life Legal Defense Foundation
CONTACT: Alexandra Snyder, 202-717-7371
|