2020 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington, DC  20006

202-546-0054
ChristianNewswire.com

                              
                                       

 

One Penn Plaza, Suite 6202
New York, NY 10119

212-290-1585
StandardNewswire.com


 

One Penn Plaza, Suite 6202
New York, NY 10119

212-290-1585
CatholicWireService.com


 

Religion Newswire
2020 Penn. Ave., NW, Suite CCN
Washington, DC  20006

202-546-0054

ReligionNewswire.com


 

2020 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington, DC  20006 U.S.A.

Life Legal Files SCOTUS Brief Demolishing Roe's Viability Standard
 
NEWS PROVIDED BY
Life Legal Defense Foundation
July 20, 2020

WASHINGTON, July 20, 2020 /Christian Newswire/ -- Life Legal filed an important amicus brief today in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization in support of Mississippi's "Gestational Age Act," which prohibits abortion after 15 weeks. We filed the brief on behalf of Dr. Robin Pierucci, a neonatologist and bioethicist who is a nationally recognized expert in care for "micro-preemies," or very young premature babies born during the second trimester of pregnancy.

Our brief is an attack on the unworkable "viability" standard adopted by the Supreme Court in Roe v. Wade and affirmed in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, which has cost the lives of millions of babies. These cases rely on a highly subjective determination of a baby's "capability of meaningful life outside the mother's womb."

But who is to say which life has meaning? The Court? The State? The abortionist?

Instead, we urge the Court to look to its own ruling in Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health, where it found that a state does not have to make judgments about the "quality" of an individual's life but can "assert an unqualified interest" in protecting human life. The Cruzan case involved a disabled young woman whose parents wanted to remove her feeding tube. The Court did not accept the parent's argument that their daughter's lack of a sufficient "quality of life" was a reason to kill her and held that a higher standard of evidence was required before someone could make the irreversible decision to end the life of a person who cannot communicate his or her wishes. In so doing, the Court affirmed the state's interest in protecting human life, without regard to the perceived worth of that life.

Our brief also takes issue with the holdings in Roe and Casey that try to define viability as a particular point in time at which a baby is capable of surviving apart from its mother. Life Legal was recently contacted by several parents whose premature babies were denied life-saving care, even though the parents begged doctors to save them. We filed complaints with the Department of Health and Human Services on their behalf and then assembled the latest research in second trimester preemies. Studies have demonstrated that a baby's survivability does not depend only on reaching a specific gestational age, but on the medical care that is available and especially on the attitudes of physicians and hospitals regarding quality of life and disability. For example, Providence Women and Children's Services of Oregon categorically denies medical care for babies before at 22 weeks or earlier, regardless of the parents' wishes. Not surprisingly, its survival rate for those babies is 0%, whereas the survival rate for 22-week babies is as high as 60% in other hospitals.

Another Supreme Court case, Colautti v. Franklin, held that the abortionist should determine whether a baby is viable. This is absurd. Abortionists have a financial--and often philosophical--interest in pushing the age of viability as far out as possible. Also, to the extent that they have any specialized training at all--and most have none--it is in obstetrics, not neonatology. In some states, like California, abortionists do not even have to hold a physician's license.

"Given Justice Robert's opinion in the recent June Medical Services case that relied so heavily on Robert's blind allegiance to Supreme Court precedence (stare decisis), we believe it is critical to present sound legal arguments as to why the Court's holdings regarding viability in Roe, Casey, and Colautti are not valid and are should long ago have been overturned," noted Life Legal Executive Director Alexandra Snyder. "The current viability framework only works for the abortion industry. It certainly doesn't work for unborn children and states trying to protect them."

About Life Legal Defense Foundation
Life Legal Defense Foundation was established in 1989, and is a nonprofit organization composed of attorneys and other concerned citizens committed to giving helpless and innocent human beings of any age, and their advocates, a trained and committed voice in the courtrooms of our nation. For more information about the Life Legal Defense Foundation, visit
www.lldf.org.

SOURCE Life Legal Defense Foundation

CONTACT: Alexandra Snyder, 202-717-7371

Related Links

https://lifelegaldefensefoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Dobbs-v.-JWHO-AC-LLDF-20200720.pdf

www.lldf.org


Issuers of news releases and not Earned Media™ are solely responsible for the accuracy of the content.
Click here for terms and conditions, including restrictions on redistribution.

Copyright © 2020 Earned Media. All Rights Reserved.