Interpretation of New
Illinois Law Could Stifle Grassroots Advocacy Groups
2020 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20006
202-546-0054
ChristianNewswire.com
One Penn Plaza, Suite 6202
New York, NY 10119
212-290-1585
StandardNewswire.com
One Penn Plaza, Suite 6202
New York, NY 10119
212-290-1585
CatholicWireService.com
Religion Newswire
2020 Penn. Ave., NW, Suite CCN
Washington, DC 20006
202-546-0054
2020 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20006 U.S.A.
Contact: Amber Dawe,
TC Public Relations, 312-422-1333,
amber@tcpr.net
CHICAGO, Oct. 1 /Christian
Newswire/ -- Pro-life advocates say a new law intended to protect
small, grassroots organizations is doing just the opposite.
Today in Kane County Circuit Court, members of the Chicago-based Pro-Life Action
League were shocked to hear Planned Parenthood of Illinois is demanding $317,322
in legal fees related to a libel lawsuit filed against it by the League and its
communication director, Eric Scheidler. Planned Parenthood says it is entitled
to recover legal fees for parts of the libel lawsuit a judge dismissed under
Illinois' new Citizen Participation Act.
"As if it weren't enough for Planned Parenthood to smear our good name with lies
in letters to the Aurora City Council and ads in newspapers, now they want to
bankrupt us and shut us down for daring to challenge their lies," said Scheidler.
According to its wording, the Act was intended to protect individuals' and small
organizations' "constitutional rights to...participate in and communicate with
government," and guard against the threat of frivolous and costly lawsuits that
might deter them from doing so.
In this case, the billion-dollar enterprise, Planned Parenthood, is using the
law to justify its defamatory statements against Scheidler and the Pro-Life
Action League, a small non-profit that operates on an annual budget of $800,000,
compared to Planned Parenthood/Chicago Area's budget of more than $15 million.
The Act was signed into law on August 28, 2007, just a week before Planned
Parenthood accused pro-life advocates of fomenting violence in local newspaper
ads and in a letter to the Aurora City Council. Judge Judith Brawka interpreted
it and the letter to City Council as being protected because the ad contained a
line urging readers to call their local alderman.
"Under this interpretation, the Citizen Participation Act has been used not to
protect, but to penalize citizen participation -- to the tune of $317,000," said
Tom Brejcha, Scheidler's attorney and chief counsel for Thomas More
Society/Pro-Life Law Center. "The enormity of Planned Parenthood's fee demand
underscores the chilling effects on First-Amendment rights that will inevitably
follow the ruling in this case."
"They're turning the Citizen Participation Act completely upside-down,"
Scheidler said. "Powerful Planned Parenthood is trying to intimidate me into
dropping my libel case under threat of financial ruin for my small non-profit
organization and my family -- but it won't work."
Scheidler and his attorneys will return to court on November 12 to respond to
Planned Parenthood's fee petition.
ERIC SCHEIDLER AND HIS ATTORNEYS ARE AVAILABLE FOR INTERVIEW.